Background Getting attention is not always a good thing An article about yourself is nothing to be proud of. The neutral point of view NPOV policy will ensure that both the good and the bad about you will be told, that whitewashing is not allowed, and that the conflict of interest COI guideline limits your ability to edit out any negative material from an article about yourself. There are serious consequences of ignoring these, and the " Law of Unintended Consequences " works on Wikipedia. For example, Tiger Woods is one of the most accomplished golfersyet his possible fall from grace is mentioned in his article.
The challenge, of course, is getting yourself listed on Wikipedia in the first place. This is equally difficult for both individuals and for businesses.
Earlier this year, I was hired by a company to create their Wikipedia page.
What this means is that if you get caught up in a scandal or otherwise receive negative press, it could show up on your page. But, as you know, there is a definite appeal to having a Wikipedia article about you, both for credibility and for your ego. For my part, the good news is that there is a wiki page for Michael Kwan already created and it has been up for a very long time.
So, what needs to happen? The Wikipedia standards effectively call for three critical elements: Getting yourself listed on Wikipedia is hardly a science.
There are steps you can take to support your case, many of which require the further support from other Wikipedia members. Get referenced in other wiki pages. If you are mentioned or referenced in other Wikipedia articles, this helps to bolster your notability.
Get mentioned in third party sources. This might start with more of a general PR campaign. If you appear in magazines and newspapers, as well as other media outlets, the perception of your legitimacy and notability is further improved.
The hope is that the rest of the Wikipedia community will jump in to expand on the stub and this helps with the neutrality requirement. Again, this helps with neutrality and notability. The page may be about you, but it needs to be supported with references to other sources.
These can be both internal Wikipedia links and links to external sources. Encourage an active discussion page. A lot of it really is outside of your control… until you leverage the power of the tribe.
If Shoemoney can be listedthen I say that all of the readers of this blog can help get a John Chow wiki page to stick too.You can’t find any information about your technology or topic in Wikipedia.
This is what prompted me to suggest that I should create a Wikipedia page for my client’s technology. To learn more about what topics Wikipedia considers notable and worthy of inclusion, read Wikipedia’s article on Notability first. If you write in Wikipedia about yourself, your group, your company, or your pet idea, once the article is created, you have no right to control its content, and no right to delete it outside our normal channels.
Content is not deleted just because somebody doesn't like it. The biggest reason to avoid a Wikipedia entry is that once you finally achieve one, it stops being your own.
You might have created it, but everyone else can edit it. Wikipedia gets some great results on Google. It usually appears near the top of Google’s Search Results Page.. If used properly Wikipedia can be a very effective online marketing tool for manufacturers and distributors.
Before you invest your time in writing a + word Wikipedia article on yourself only to get it deleted by one of the admin folks, start with just a sentence or two. The hope is that the rest of the Wikipedia community will jump in to expand on the stub and this helps with the neutrality requirement.
Aug 07, · You shouldn't make a Wikipedia page about yourself. If you want to write something about yourself, and to write your autobiography or reflect on yourself, try MySpace or Facebook. Or, try LiveJournal if you're in for some serious leslutinsduphoenix.com: Resolved.